Law:

Section:

Industrial dispute Termination of serviceEmployee who was employed temporarily on workcharge basis was terminated after completion of work for which he was engagedEmployee could not challenge his termination as his services could be terminated even orally as he was working on workcharge basis. Muhammad Yakoob v. Punjab Labour Court No. 1 and others 1990 SCMR 1539; Faqir Muhammad v. Director of National Savings, Multan Division 1992 PLC 163 and Government of Balorhistan v. Livestock Department v. Livestock Employees' Union 1993 PLC 13 ref. DECISION This. appeal calls in question the order of the Labour Court No. VII at Slur by which the petition under section 25A, I.R.O. was allowed. In brief it arose in the following circumstances: It was alleged that the petitioner was employed with the respondent No. 1 as Beldar vide order dated 16101488 anti was posted at Nara Sub Division of Irrigation Department, Sukkur. He was promoted to the Darogha and was given his posting in the Januji heat. As he happened to be an officebearer of the trade union, the authorities were nursing a grudge against him. He did not receive his pay also for some months. He did not specifically mention that his services had been terminated but referred to threats coming from the authorities in regard to the same. 2. In the Reply Statement filed by respondent No. 1 the main allegations came to be denied. It was alleged that his appointment as Beldar was, temporary and was on the workcharge basis. It went on to say that he was not promoted but was given appointment as Darogha and that also on workcharge basis. The termination of service came on 3131991. It was also alleged that there was no grievance notice served on the respondent and as such the petition was liable to be dismissed on that ground alone. The other respondents…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492