Case Details

Citation(s)
1994 SLG 585 1994 SLD 585 1994 PLC 196
National Industrial Relations Commission
Case No. 24(195)/93-K of 1994, decision dated: 11-01-1994.
TAHSEEN AHMED BHATTI MEMBER
Muhammad Nishat Warsi for Petitioner. S.M. Yaqoob for
Respondent No. 1: Saleem Raza, Representative for
Respondent No. 2. Khalid Imran, Assistant Law Officer for
Respondent No. 3.

PLASTICRAFTERS LABOUR UNION through GENERAL Secretary

VS

M/s. PLASTICRAFTERS (PVT.) LIMITED and 2 others

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)Ss. 15(1)(g) & 22ANational Industrial Relations Commission (Procedure and Functions) Regulations, 1973, Regln. 32(2)(c)Allegation of unfair labour practice on part of employersAd interim order­Recalling ofTerm of existing labour union in establishment having expired, fresh referendum was heldExisting labour union had challenged referendum alleging that employers had used force and manipulation in influencing balloting of referendum by providing prestamped ballot papers to workers of opposite union alleged to be pocket union of employersLabour Union in application for ad interim order supported by affidavit, had prayed not to issue Collective Bargaining Agent (C.BA.) Certificate to union succeeded in referendum and to direct Authority concerned to make arrangements for fresh pollsEmployers had denied allegations levelled against them and no other prima facie independent evidence was available to lend support to such allegationsLabour Union having failed to make out prima facie case for confirmation of ad interim order already granted to it, application for ad interim order was dismissed and ad interim order already granted was recalled. Muhammad Nishat Warsi for Petitioner. S.M. Yaqoob for Respondent No. 1: Saleem Raza, Representative for Respondent No. 2. Khalid Imran, Assistant Law Officer for Respondent No. 3. Date of hearing: 9th January, 1994. ORDER Arguments of all the Advocates/representatives for all the parties on stay application were heard on 1011994. On 13121993 petitioner filed the case under section 22A(8)(g) of the IRO, 1969 alleging unfair labour practice against the respondents in influencing the balloting provided for in section 22, ibid. On the same day an application for prohibitory order under Regulation 32(2)(c) was also filed requesting to direct the respondent No. 3 not to announce final result of referendum held on 8121993 and on which ad interim order was passed with notice to respondents. 2. Briefly the case of the petitioner is that it is registered labour union having been CBA since 1989 and that its term expired in December, 1992 within the establishment of respondent No. 1 which…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492