| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1992 SLG 836 1992 SLD 836 1992 PLC 517 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. KAR-83 of 1991, decided on 15th January, 1992.
AGHA ALI HAIDER, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No. KAR-83 of 1991, decided on 15th January, 1992.
AGHA ALI HAIDER, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Messrs GANGULI TEXTILE MILLS
VS
MUHMAMMAD MUSHTAOUE and another Messrs GANGULI TEXTILE MILLS vs MUHMAMMAD MUSHTAOUE and another
Law:
Section:
Industrial dispute--- ----Termination of service---Relationship of employer and employee--Employee whose services were terminated, claimed to be employee of employer working as `Weaver' therein for a number of years, but employer declined existence of relationship of employee and employer between them--No doubt, employee had no document in his possession to prove that he was working with employer, but witness produced by employer itself, had admitted that practice of giving any letter of appointment did not exist in employers' establishment---Finding of Labour Court that relationship of employer and employee existed between the parties, was correct and could not be interfered with. MA. Hassan for Appellant. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 15th January, 1992. DECISION It was alleged by the applicant/respondent in his grievance petition that he was working as a `Weaver' with the appellant mill for a number of years, and had met with an accident while on duty which resulted in the loss of a finger. He was then told that he need not come any more as his services were terminated. He has sent a grievance notice and receiving no satisfaction had filed the grievance petition. The written statement filed present appellant was a total denial of any relationship between the parties. 2. The respondent was his own witness while two persons were produced on behalf of the appellant, namely Muhammad Afzal and Sardar Muhammad, As the latter was not made available for cross-examination, his statement Nit to be totally excluded from consideration. The Labour Court accepted the version of the respondent and allowed the grievance application resulting this appeal. 3. I have heard Mr. MA. Hassan, Advocate for the appellant The respondent who had all along…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492