| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1993 SLG 1222 1993 SLD 1222 1993 PLC 263 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. KAR-496 of 1991, decided on 22nd October, 1992.
AGHA ALI HYDER, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No. KAR-496 of 1991, decided on 22nd October, 1992.
AGHA ALI HYDER, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
VS
and another
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----S. 25-A---Grievance petition---Case of employee as presented before Trial Court was that his services were verbally terminated by employer as there was some dispute between them about annual increment---Employer denying allegations had contended that employee earlier was working with them as a `Jobber' and as services of all Jobbers were to be terminated, employee himself tendered his resignation and applied afresh for appointment as an operator--Request of employee was acceded to, but he after working for a few months had lost interest in job of operator and resigned---Employer further contended that resignation of employee was accepted and all payments due to him were paid to him---Employers had fully supported their version by producing resignation of employee, application for re-appointment as operator and payments made to him at time he left job as a Jobber and later on as an operator----Employee could not deny receipts of payments and other documents produced by employers to prove their case and no support was forthcoming for version of employee from any quarters whatsoever--Employee having failed to prove his case, his grievance petition was rightly dismissed by Trial Court. Gohar Iqbal for Appellant. A. Hafeez for Respondent. Date of hearing: 22nd October, 1992. DECISION This appeal from the order of the Labour Court dismissing the grievance application filed by the appellant under section 25-A of the IRO arises in the following circumstances:-- The case of the appellant as presented before the Labour Court was that he had been working with the respondent for a number of years and in the month of May, 1989 there was some dispute between them about the annual increment. To silence him, his services came to be terminated verbally. 2. All this came to be denied in the Written Reply. Shorn of unnecessary legal and factual contentions raised, suffice it to say that their case was that the petitioner was working as a jobber with them and because services of all the jobbers were to be terminated, the petitioner had tendered his resignation and applied afresh for appointment as an operator. The request was…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492