Case Details

Citation(s)
1994 SLG 602 1994 SLD 602 1994 PLC 230
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. HYD-487 of 1991, decision dated: 23rd December, 1993.
AGHA ALI HYDER, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Hakim Ali Siddiqui for Appellants. M. Bashir Awan for
Respondent.

HABIB BANK LIMITED, KARACHI and 2 others

VS

DAD MUHAMMAD BALOCH

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)S. 25AGrievance noticeEmployee who was arrested in a criminal case was bailed out but his employment was terminatedEmployee after release on bail and after his acquittal did not report for duty and did not serve grievance notice in time, but waited for years from the day cause of action had accrued to himAggrieved workman, had to take steps for redress of his grievance according to procedure prescribed under S. 25AEmployee had to bring his grievance to notice of employer in writing, either himself or through his shop steward or agent within three months of the day on which cause of grievance had accrued to him.In case demand. of employee was not met, petition was to be filed within prescribed periodEmployee having failed to take step for redress of his grievance according to prescribed procedure, he could not be ordered to be reinstatedLabour Court having failed to account for delay in filing grievance notice and petition, was not justified in accepting grievance petition and to reinstating employee. Ishrat Iqbal Siddiqui and Syed Shakeel Haider Rizvi v. Muslim Commercial Bank Limited, Hyderabad 1992 PLC 936 ref, Hakim Ali Siddiqui for Appellants. M. Bashir Awan for Respondent. Date of hearing: 8th December, 1993. DECISION This appeal calls in question the order of the Labour Court No. VI, Hyderabad, in a petition filed under section 25A of the I.R.O., 1969, which was allowed, and the petitioner was reinstated in service with full back benefit It arose in the following circumstances: 2. The petitioner was employed in the year 1983 as a Godown Keeper at the Tando Adam Branch of the respondent Bank and his duty was to supervise the goods lying in the premises of Messrs Tanveer Textile Mills, which had been pledged with the respondents. He had been there for a number of years but the appointment letters issued were for a few months at a time with a break of a day or so every time. The last appointment letter was dated 184­1988, for a period for three months ending on 1871988. It appears that he came to be arrested in a criminal case concerning the pledged goods on 66­1988 and was released on bail on 791988. He states…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492