| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1994 SLG 610 1994 SLD 610 1994 PLC 246 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeals Nos. HYD-627 to 632 of 1992, decision dated: 30-11-1993.
AGHA ALI HYDER, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
S. Fasahat Hussain Rizvi for Appellants. Raees M. Mushtaq for
Respondent.
Appeals Nos. HYD-627 to 632 of 1992, decision dated: 30-11-1993.
AGHA ALI HYDER, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
S. Fasahat Hussain Rizvi for Appellants. Raees M. Mushtaq for
Respondent.
MALIK MASIH and others
VS
FAUJI SUGAR MILLS, TANDO MUHAMMAD KHAN through GENERAL Manager and others
Law:
Section:
Industrial dispute Dismissal from serviceEmployees who were sweepers, were dismissed from service on allegations that they raised certain demands and had raised slogans against management and had thrown rubbish in offices of officers which had polluted Quranic Verses kept under table glass in those offices which ad of employees had injured feelings of all and sundryEmployees were chargesheeted for perpetration of act of sacrilege and domestic enquiry was ordered against them, but employees boycotted enquiry proceedingsDismissal order neither was challenged by employees in domestic enquiry despite due knowledge nor was challenged by them before Court belowCourt below, in circumstances had rightly dismissed grievance petition of employees holding that dismissal order having not been challenged by employees, no relief could be granted to them. S. Fasahat Hussain Rizvi for Appellants. Raees M. Mushtaq for Respondent. Date of hearing: 28th November, 1993. DECISION These 6 appeals from the composite order of the Labour Court No.VI at Hyderabad dismissing the petitions filed under section 25A of the I.R.O. arise in the following circumstances: It was alleged by the petitioners that on the 26th of November, 1993 when the sweepers of the respondent mill were having their meals during the break, a police party had turned up and taken away a number of them to the police station. They have asked the others to follow them. However, after a few hours they were allowed to return to their homes. The next day when they reported for duty they were refused work. It went on to say that it was on the 10th of December that they had received showcause notices as to why they should not be proceeded against for remaining absent for more than 10 days. This was replied too but still they were not being permitted to work for them. It was thereafter that they had sent grievance notices which had remained un-replied. They had, therefore, filed petitions with the prayer that as they had been illegally removed from service a direction be issued to the respondent to reinstate them on their jobs. . 2. In the written reply it was stated that on 25111990 at about 7 a.m. the petitioners had…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492