| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1963 SLG 275 1963 SLD 275 (1963) 48 ITR 598 |
Madras High Court
APPEAL No. 62 OF 1958, JULY 24, 1962
GANAPATIA PILLAI AND VENKATADRI, JJ
S.P. Radhakrishna Naidu and K. Kumaraswami for the Appellant. C.S. Rama Rao Sahib and S. Ranganathan for the
Respondent
APPEAL No. 62 OF 1958, JULY 24, 1962
GANAPATIA PILLAI AND VENKATADRI, JJ
S.P. Radhakrishna Naidu and K. Kumaraswami for the Appellant. C.S. Rama Rao Sahib and S. Ranganathan for the
Respondent
Rangammal
v.
Union of India
Law: Income Tax Act, 1922
Section: 4
Section 226, read with section 5 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Corresponding to section 46, read with section 4, of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922) - Collection and recovery - Other modes of recovery - Assessment years 1944-45 to 1947-48 - P, who was carrying on business in hardware and had acquired a number of properties, died in 1937 and after his death his sons started other businesses and business carried on by P was also continued - Income from all business was assessed by income-tax authorities as joint family businesses though it was contended that business started after death of P were not joint family businesses - Certain arrears of tax, so assessed, were to be realised for which income-tax authorities took steps to attach and bring to sale suit properties - A suit was filed in 1956 for declaration that suit properties could not be sold for realisation of arrears of income-tax - Earlier in 1948 a suit was filed by minors against their major brothers for partition of joint family estate and by a decree certain properties, were allotted to minor plaintiffs - In addition to this Rs. 4,000 was directed to be provided for marriage expenses of one of minors for which a charge was created on certain suit properties - In suit filed in 1946, against which instant appeal arose, subordinate Judge held that businesses, profits of which were taxed by income-tax authorities, were joint family businesses - Whether subordinate Judge was justified in so holding and, therefore, appellants could not escape liability for paying taxes due on profits of such business - Held, yes - Whether mere fact that a partition was effected in pursuance of preliminary decree in suit would not affect question of liability of properties in suit for tax arrears - Held, yes Section 67, read with section 25A, of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Bar of suits in Civil Court - Assessment years 1944-45 to 1947-48 - Whether, an facts stated under heading "collection and recovery - Other modes of recovery", section 67 was a bar to maintainability of suit, even though declaration asked for did not in terms refer to cancellation of assessment made by tax authorities - Held, yes FACTS The appellants…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492