| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1992 SLG 884 1992 SLD 884 1992 PLC 602 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. KAR-65 of 1990, decided on 6th December, 1990.
AHMED ALI U. QURESHI APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No. KAR-65 of 1990, decided on 6th December, 1990.
AHMED ALI U. QURESHI APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
AZIZUR RAHMAN
VS
PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI AZIZUR RAHMAN vs PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----S. 25-A---Trade/Grade Structure Promotion/Recruitment Rules, 1983--Pay---Removal of anomaly---Appellant claiming for seniority and grant of relevant pay glade as against a co-worker who was given relevant grade retrospectively---Appellant's claim was rejected by Labour Court which dismissed his grievance petition on ground that it was not based on any agreement, award or law---Question arising whether under any Settlement, award or law appellant was entitled to get relief---Settlement between C.B.A. and Management provided for removal of anomalies---If any anomaly existed between the pay and grade of appellant and other co-workers, its removal was to take effect in terms of settlement---Appellant had to enforce his right to get anomalies removed through the Labour Court in case the Anomaly Committee, framed under the Agreement, did not remove same---Anomaly Committee made certain decisions/observations referred to it and allowed relevant grade to certain employees from date of their appointment which appellant had not received---Discrimination as such had been made in case of appellant---Appellant was also entitled to relevant grade from date of his appointment and also to time scale provided under Trade/Grade Selection/Promotion Recruitment Rules, 1983---Pay of appellant was ordered to be fixed in accordance with discretion of Tribunal and difference of pay allowed to him from the last three years before institution of grievance petition---Question of payment of arrears was left to be decided in accordance with law. Shamshuddin Khalid for Appellant. S.M. Yaqoob, Representative for Respondent.:- Date of hearing: 29th November, 1990. DECISION This is an appeal against the order of learned Presiding Officer, Sindh Labour Court No. IV, at Karachi, dated 4-2-1990, whereby the grievance petition of the appellant was dismissed. 2. I have heard Mr. Shamsuddin Khalid, learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. S.M. Yaqoob, learned Representative for the respondents and have also gone through the record and proceedings of the case. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant was admittedly appointed as…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492