Law:

Section:

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)-- ----S. 1 & S.O. 12---Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), S. 25-A---Reinstatement---Services of employees were terminated without any written order---Employee was reinstated by Labour Court---Employer challenged order of Labour Court on ground that West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 was not applicable to the establishment and therefore order of termination in writing was not necessary---Witness/Acting Manager of factory, examined by employer admitting in cross-examination that according to Payment Register workers employed during last preceding 12 months were more than twenty--­Held, Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968 was applicable to the establishment which could not as such remove, discharge or terminate a worker except by an order in writing---Order of reinstatement was upheld. Muhammad Moosa Laghari for Appellants. Rana Mahmood, Representative for Respondents. Date of hearing: 20th January, 1991. DECISION These 2 appeals are directed against the single order of learned Presiding Officer, Sindh Labour Court No. VI at Hyderabad, dated 26-5-1987, whereby the grievance petition of the respondents and 2 other workmen were allowed and they were ordered to be reinstated in service with full back benefits. I propose to dispose of both these appeals by this single decision. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents were admittedly employed as workmen with the appellants who terminated their services on 15-1-1986 without written orders alongwith the services of 2 other workmen, namely, Muhammad Iqbal and Muhammad Ibrahim. The respondents and other 2 workmen after serving the grievance notices upon the management filed their grievance petitions before the learned Labour Court which were allowed by the impugned order. 3. I have heard Mr. Muhammad Moosa Laghari, the learned Advocate for the appellants and Mr. Rana Mahmood, learned Representative for the respondents and have also gone through the record and proceedings of the cases. 4. The only point raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492