| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1992 SLG 1160 1992 SLD 1160 1992 PLC 1179 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeals Nos. SUK-265 and SUK-266 of 1989, decided on 4th August, 1990.
AHMED ALI U. QURESHI APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeals Nos. SUK-265 and SUK-266 of 1989, decided on 4th August, 1990.
AHMED ALI U. QURESHI APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
1992 P L C 1179 UNITED BANK LIMITED and others
VS
MUHAMMAD ISLAM QURESHI 1992 P L C 1179 UNITED BANK LIMITED and others vs MUHAMMAD ISLAM QURESHI
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)---- ----S.38---Appeal---Presentation---Appellant being an incorporated Bank appeal on its behalf was to be presented, according to a clause in power of attorney, executed by it by an authorised officer (attorney of Bank) jointly with another attorney--- Record not showing that authorised officer had presented appeal jointly with another attorney of bank---Appeal, held, could not be said to have been filed by an authorised officer on behalf of bank---View that appeal could be presented by any one of the aggrieved persons was repelled. Nadeem Iqbal Khan v. Fuji Colour Pakistan Laboratory and others 1980 SCMR 1089; Director, Medical Services, K.M.C. and another v. Fiaz Ahmed 1989 PLC 175 and Chamber of Commerce and Industry Karachi v. Chamber of Commerce and Industry Employees' Union 1989 PLC 176 rel. Sadiq Khan for Appellants. Gohar Iqbal, Representative for Respondent. Date of hearing: 4th August, 1990. DECISION These appeals are against the orders of the learned Presiding Officer, With Sindh Labour Court at Sukkur, dated 29-3-1989, whereby the grievance petition of the respondents were allowed. Legal objection has been raised by the learned Advocates for the respondents in both the appeals of similar nature, I therefore, will dispose of both the appeals by this single decision. 2. I have heard Mr. Sadiq Khan, learned Advocate for the appellants and Mr. Ghoar Iqbal, Representative for the respondents and have also gone through the record and proceedings of the case. 3. Mr. Ghoar Iqbal has taken the plea that the appeals were not filed by the aggrieved persons and therefore were not maintainable as held by this Tribunal in Appeal No. SUK-363 of 1989. Mr. Sadiq Khan contended that the grievance was against the institution viz. United Bank Limited and not against any particular officer and therefore the institution could present appeal through any of its authorised employee as laid down under Orders 29, Rules 1 and 2, C.P.C. read with Order 3, Rules 3, 4 and 6, C.P.C. He further contended that the officers would come and go but proceedings in the grievance application as well as appeal would continue. He further…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492