| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1991 SLG 2014 1991 SLD 2014 1991 PLC 1141 |
Service Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. 52 of 1990, decided on 28th November, 1990.
MUNAWAR ALI KHAN, CHAIRMAN, TASNEEM AHMED SIDDIQUI AND GHULAM MUJADDID ISRAN, MEMBERS
Manzoor Ali Khan for Appellant. M.M. Aqil, Government Counsel for
Respondents.
Appeal No. 52 of 1990, decided on 28th November, 1990.
MUNAWAR ALI KHAN, CHAIRMAN, TASNEEM AHMED SIDDIQUI AND GHULAM MUJADDID ISRAN, MEMBERS
Manzoor Ali Khan for Appellant. M.M. Aqil, Government Counsel for
Respondents.
Haji ABDULLAH LAHOOTY
VS
Haji ABDULLAH LAHOOTY vs GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others
Law:
Section:
Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973)--- ----S. 4---Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973, R. 4--Dismissal from service on charges of inefficiency and corruption ---Validity--Order of dismissal was passed by competent Authority on basis of inquiry conducted by Judge of High Court who on basis of evidence found most of the charges as proved---No reason was pointed out to interfere with the conclusion that civil servant was guilty of charges levelled 'against him---Charge of corruption being serious one civil servant did not deserve any leniency in punishment already awarded to him. JUDGMENT MUNAWAR ALI KHAN (CHAIRMAN).--- This appeal arose from appellant's dismissal from service vide Chief Minister's order dated 12-3-1990 communicated to the appellant 10 days later on 22 -3-1990. The appellant's case, as disclosed in the memo of appeal, is that he joined Government service as Civil Judge on 11-1-1981 and was promoted as Senior Civil Judge in 1985. He was posted in that capacity at Shikarpur from 31-7-1986 to 29-5-1989. During that period he was first served with show-cause notice dated 27-2-1989 to which he submitted his reply on 15-4-1989 and thereafter a charge-sheet accompanied by statement of allegations was served on him on 22-5-1989. The appellant submitted his reply to the charge-sheet on 13-6-1989. Mr. Justice Mukhtar Ahmed Junejo was nominated as Enquiry Officer to hold a detailed enquiry into the allegations made against the appellant. 1n course of the enquiry several witnesses were examined both on behalf of the department and the appellant. The Enquiry Officer submitted his report dated 17th October, 1989, holding the charges Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 6 as proved and charges Nos. 4 and 5 as not proved. The appellant was then given final show-cause notice alongwith a copy of enquiry report. After considering his reply to the said show-cause notice, the appellant was dismissed from service as mentioned above. He made review application against the order of his dismissal and after waiting for usual period of 90 days for decision thereon, he filed the present service appeal before this 'Tribunal on 24-7-1990: We heard Mr. Manzoor Ali…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492