Case Details

Citation(s)
1993 SLG 1415 1993 SLD 1415 1993 PLC 613
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Appeal No. 463(L) of 1982, decided on16th September, 1991.
SYED ALLY MADAD SHAH, CHAIRMAN AND CH. HASAN NAWAZ, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

HAQ NAWAZ

VS

ISLAMABAD and 15 others

Law:

Section:

Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)--- ----S. 4---Promotion---Appellant belonging to category B' challenging respondents' promotion who belonged to category `A' in BPS-16, on ad hoc basis---Such promotions were made when appellant was not eligible to be considered for promotion on ad hoc or regular basis---Appellant's Group 'B' had been given its due share in the promotion quota at the appropriate time; but appellant could not bear its fruits as he could not reach that stage by the time he retired from service---Appellant had absolutely no case to claim promotion over and above respondent civil servants who belonged to category `A' and were senior to him in every respect---Appeal against promotion of respondents having no merit, was dismissed in circumstances. Appellant in person. Nemo for Respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 12 in person. None of the Remaining Private Respondents present. Date of hearing: 25th August, 1991. JUDGMENT SYED ALLY MADAD SHAH (CHAIRMAN): --Appellant Haq Nawaz was a Stenographer in the Office of the Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railways, Multan. His case is that as a matter of policy laid down under letter No. 752-E/85-III (E.1/8), dated 8-12-1976 and CPO Lahore Letters No. 757-E/85-III (E.Policy), dated 8-9-1981; No. 757-E/6/(JPO-I), dated 23-9-1980; No. 803-E/113-XVI (E.1), dated 27-10-1979 and No. 803­E/113-XVII (E.Policy), dated 22-9-1980, 1/3rd of the posts in Grade-16 in the Personnel Section were allocated to the Stenographers. The respondents Nos. 2 to 16 belonging to different cadres other than that of the Stenographers were promoted to Grade-16 posts in May, 1980, while the Stenographers were ignored. During the processing of those promotions, the appellant submitted representation dated 25-5-1980 that the Stenographers also may be considered for their promotion to Grade-16. There were representations by some other Stenographers as well. The decision taken on their representations was that the Stenographers would be considered for Selection Grade-16, in due course, provided they were sufficiently senior and eligible therefore and the decision was communicated to the Divisional Superintendents, Pakistan Railways, Multan…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492