| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1993 SLG 538 1993 SLD 538 1993 SCMR 200 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 182-K of 1991, decision dated: 1st November, 1992(On Appeal from the judgment dated 13-1-1991 of the High Court of Sindh, Karachi, passed in F.RA. No.806 of 1989)
AJMAL MIAN AND SAJJAD ALI SHAH, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Appeal No. 182-K of 1991, decision dated: 1st November, 1992(On Appeal from the judgment dated 13-1-1991 of the High Court of Sindh, Karachi, passed in F.RA. No.806 of 1989)
AJMAL MIAN AND SAJJAD ALI SHAH, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
M.K. MUHAMMAD and others
MUHAMMAD ABU BAKAR
Law:
Section:
(a) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)--Ss.15 & 21---West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S.13---Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), 5.105----Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)---Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether agreement of tenancy containing admission with regard to acceptance of Pugree would render agreement as void and not enforceable under the provisions of West Pakistan Urban Rent Restrictions Ordinance, 1959; Whether tenant, in case of void agreement would acquire rights of tenant at will and was liable to be ejected for non-payment of rent under the general law and not under the provisions of Rent Restriction Laws, and whether in such circumstances alternatively provisions of Transfer of Property Act would be attracted. Whether High Court exceeded jurisdiction vested in it while exercising powers vested in it under sections 15 and 21 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 or under the provisions of West Pakistan Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, by directing refund of amount of Pugree to the petitioners allowing ejectment on refund of amount of Pugree; Whether evidence brought on the record was sufficient to justify eviction on the grounds of default and personal need; and Whether ratio laid down in the cases of Sheikh Muhammad Yousaf v. District Judge, Rawlpindi and others 1987 SCMR 307, and Habib Bank Limited v. Dr. Munawar Ali Siddiqui 1991 SCMR 1185 would govern the case or not for the reason that reported cases were distinguishable on the ground of different facts and background. Sheikh Muhammad Yousaf v. District Judge, Rawalpindi and others 1987 SCMR 307 and Habib Bank Limited v. Dr. Munawar Ali Siddiqui 1991 SCMR 1185 ref. (b) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)--- ----S.13---Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S.105---Tenant paying to landlord specified amount in addition to rent---Jurisdiction of Rent Controller whether taken away, where relationship of landlord and tenant was not denied---Mere fact that tenant had paid specified amount in addition to rent, would not take away jurisdiction of Rent Controller in a case in which relationship of landlord and tenant…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492