Case Details

Citation(s)
1989 SLG 890 1989 SLD 890 1989 PLD 13
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No.337-K of 1988, decision dated: 29-08-1988. (On appeal from the judgment and order dated 1-8-1988 of High Court of Baluchistan, Quetta, in Constitution Petition No.173/88.)
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J., ABDUL KADIR SHEIKH, SHAFIUR RAHMAN, JAVID IQBAL AND S. USMAN ALI SHAH, JJ
Khalid M. Ishaque, Advocate Supreme Court and Mrs. Majida Razvi, Advocate-on-Record. Mir Nawaz Marri, Assistant Advocate General Baluchistan.

MUHAMMAD YAQUB

VS

GOVERNMENT OF BALUCHISTAN and another

Law:

Section:

Special Courts for Speedy Trials Act (XV of 1987)-----Ss.2(c), 5 & 7-11 Offence"--- Definition--- "Public interest' Connotation- -Power to transfer the case to Special Court cannot exercised unless the "offence" satisfies the guidelines enumerated the definition-Special Court has to satisfy itself that said guidelines exist to give it the jurisdiction to try the case--Opinion as envisaged in S.2(c) of the Act should be relatable to the guidelines which elemental in the concept of "public interest" and this should appear from the order of transfer of case itself. The word "offence" in section 2(c) of the Special Courts Speedy Trials Act, 1987 means "an offence specified in the Schedule which, in the opinion of the Government, is gruesome, brutal sensational in character or shocking to public morality or has led public outrage or created panic or an atmosphere of fear or anxiety amongst the public or a section thereof". An offence cannot be an offence specified in the Schedule unless it conforms to the guidelines mentioned in section 2(c) of Act. It is the commission of this offence which the Special Court take cognizance of under section 7 of the Act in pursuance 0f report under section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This, therefore, a duty cast on the Special Court before it takes 'cognizance to satisfy itself that the guidelines exist to give to it jurisdiction to try the case. Reading, therefore, the definition of word "offence" in section 2(c) and section 5 of the Act together conclusion is obvious that unless the "offence" satisfies the guidelines enumerated in the definition, the power to transfer the case can arise in the public interest which is an expression of wide imp and means "general social welfare or regard for social good predicating interest of the general public in matters where a regard for the social good is of the first moment. The opinion, therefore should be relatable to the guidelines which are elemental in the concept of "public interest" and this should appear from the order itself. In the present case while transferring the case from the Court of a competent jurisdiction, there was no consideration of the guidelines which…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492