Law:

Section:

Supreme Court Rules, 1980--O.XXVI, R.6--R; view before Supreme Court--Determinative findings having been recorded on the two points urged by petitioner after considering all the facts of the case, no case for review of was made out--Review petition being devoid of merits was dismissed as not maintainable. Ch. Khalil-ur-Rehman, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 24th October, 1988. JUDGMENT SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.--The petitioner seeks review of our judgment dated 17-4-1988 dismissing his appeal. 2. Ch. Khalil-ur-Rehman, Advocate, the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that in affirming the finding that the Constitutional Petition filed by the petitioner suffered from laches, this Court has omitted to take note of the order granting leave to appeal in which it was mentioned that the petitioner had been following his remedy till 20-6-1974 and further that in fact he had been representing to the various authorities in the matter. Further it is contended that it was not in fact a claim for reduction of the price but for correct assessment of the price. According to the learned counsel, if these two things had been taken into consideration the conclusions drawn would have been…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492