Law:

Section:

(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-- ---S.22-Collective Bargaining Agent--Referendum-Members of petitioner Union were members either of Employees Union or Staff Union and had participated in referendum in 196, there being no Union of their own until much later when it was registered in May, 1987--Members of petitioner-Union, held, had to abide by result of referendum and could not after participating in such referendum turn round and say that they would not abide by result of referendum--Fact that petitioner-Union had subsequently been registered as a Trade Union of City Zone would not have effect of annulling or reducing scope of operation of referendum. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)------ ---S.22--Collective Bargaining Agent--For two different zones of an establishment (City Zone and Cantt. Zone) two Unions existing of employees comprising of employees of both zones--Referendum was held and one of Unions was declared as a Collective Bargaining Agent--Notwithstanding two zones, establishment was taken as one and declaration of Collective Bargaining Agent was issued under S.22(2) of Industrial Relations Ordinance--Members of petitioner-Union belonging to city Zone praying that they had been registered, were independent being only Union of that Zone and therefore were entitled to be declared as a Collective Bargaining Agent of City Zone under 8.22(1) of Ordinance--Submission made by petitioner in support of their contention self-defeating--Members of petitioner-Union had previously participated in a lawfully held referendum in 1988 when there was no Union of their own until when they were registered on 14-5-1987--Petitioner-Union coming into being thereafter, held, had to abide by result of referendum of 1988 which was held for a period of two years and one year having already gone by petitioners were advised to wait for another year to let law have its course. (c) Interpretation of statutes-- ---Interpretation which destroyed efficacy of law and its consequences, held, could not be countenanced in a Court of law. ORDER Habib Bank Limited, Multan was bifurcated into two Zones in 1984 as City Zone and Cantt: Zone. It had two…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492