| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1989 SLG 1829 1989 SLD 1829 1989 PLC 637 |
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Appeal No. 386(R) of 1986, decided on 20th February, 1989.
SYED ALLY MADAD SHAH, CHAIRMAN AND MISBAH ULLAH KHAN, MEMBER
Raja Muhammad Asghar Khan for Appellant. Aminur Rehman Khan for
Respondents Nos. 3 and 4.
Appeal No. 386(R) of 1986, decided on 20th February, 1989.
SYED ALLY MADAD SHAH, CHAIRMAN AND MISBAH ULLAH KHAN, MEMBER
Raja Muhammad Asghar Khan for Appellant. Aminur Rehman Khan for
Respondents Nos. 3 and 4.
Khan BADSHAH FAYYAZ
VS
SECRETRARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, RAWALPINDI and 3 other.
Law:
Section:
(a) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973)-- ---S. 5--Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973, R. 3-= Mode of appointment to civil posts--Appointments to civil posts would be made by two methods viz. promotion or transfer and initial appointment in the manner provided in the Rules--Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973 do not provide for any other mode of appointments muchless the mode of absorption. (b) Civil service-- --- ESTACODE (1983 Edn.), p. 218--Seniority on transfer, counting of--Seniority in the office to which a civil servant has been transferred is to be determined in the manner that when it is open to the person concerned to accept or refuse are offer of appointment in any office, he should count his seniority in the new office from the date of his transfer to that office; when a person is compulsorily transferred to another office as a result of conscription or alongwith the post and his work, he should be allowed to count his previous continuous service in the grade towards seniority in that grade in the new office. (c) Civil service-- --- Policy decisions in respect of services in the Federal Government are issued by and from the Establishment Division--Policy in respect of absorption of surplus staff, was thus a valid document issued from a competent source--Seniority of civil servant and that of respondents having been determined in accordance with Establishment Division Policy, would not be assailable--Respondents had been rightly assigned seniority above the civil servant/appellant on considering their previous service. (d) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)-- ---S. 4--Appeal--Limitation--Compentency--Appeal filed before Service Tribunal within thirty days from the departmental appellate order would be within time. JUDGMENT SYED ALLY MADAD SHAH (CHAIRMAN).--Appellant Mr. Khan Badshah Fayyaz has preferred this appeal for determination of his seniority vis-avis. respondents Nos. 3 and 4, M/s. Naeem Akhtar Naeem and Iqbal Ahmad, all serving as Deputy Directors (B-18) in the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development. 2. The appellant was working as a Research Officer (B-17) in the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492