Law:

Section:

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-- ---O. XXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2--Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Ss.25-A & 38(3-a)--Ad interim stay order--Neither in the ad interim stay order nor in the order confirming ad interim stay order, issued in favour of employer, it was mentioned that employer had a prima facie case, balance of convenience in its favour and irreparable loss was likely to be suffered by it--Office holders of Union were prevented from acting as such by said stay order--Union was registered one and its office holders had a vested right to work for benefit of workers--Held, there was no justification for Labour Court to issue stay order-­Order of Labour Court set aside and said Court , was directed to re-decide application of employer for issuance of stay order in view of observations made by Appellate Tribunal. JUDGMENT This is a revision reporting that the order dated 4-6-1988 recorded by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 1, Lahore confirming the ad interim stay order is without jurisdiction and of no legal effect. 2. Neither in the ad interim stay order nor in the order dated 4-6-1988 whereby ad interim order was confirmed and the application of the petitioner for vacation of the stay order was rejected, it is discussed if the respondents had a prima facie case, that the balance of convenience was in their favour and that irreparable loss was likely to be…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492