Case Details

Citation(s)
1989 SLG 1612 1989 SLD 1612 1989 PLC 872
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. KAR-3-50 of 1988, decided on 10th January, 1989.
AHMED ALI U. QURESHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Narayan Das for Appellants.

KARACHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION

VS

GHULAM ALI

Law:

Section:

(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)---- ----Ss. 25-A & 36--Procedure--Evidence--Written statement not verified on oath-­Signatory of written statement not examined before Labour Court--Such written statement cannot be considered as a piece of evidence. PLD 1972 SC 25 re1. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (w11 of 1969)----- ------S. 25-A--Grievance petition against dismissal for misconduct--Bus conductor alleged to have received fare without issuance of tickets--Neither ticketless passengers nor any member of checking party nor Enquiry Officer examined before Labour Court------Allegation denied by accused--Mere production of enquiry report containing statements of witnesses without examining such witnesses before Labour Court, held, would not be sufficient in rebuttal of assertions of accused. 1968 P L C 701 ref. DECISION This is an appeal directed against the order passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Sind Labour Court No. I at Karachi, dated 10-10-1988. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent was admittedly a workman of the appellants employed as a Conductor of the bus. He is alleged to have charged fare from certain passengers without issuing the tickets, which was detected by the checking party. He was charge-sheeted and after enquiry he was dismissed from service. The respondent after giving grievance notice to the appellants filed grievance petition which was allowed by the learned Labour Court holding that the domestic enquiry was not fair or legal as it was held in piece meal by 3 different enquiry officers. 3. I have heard Mr. Narayan Das, the learned Advocate for the appellants. Admittedly the passengers from whom the respondent is alleged to have charged fare without issuing tickets were not examined either before the Enquiry Officer or before the Labour Court. It has been consistently held by this Tribunal and the Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal that without examination of such witnesses, the charge cannot be held to be proved against accused person.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492