Case Details

Citation(s)
1989 SLG 1528 1989 SLD 1528 1989 PLC 732
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal NO.KAR-21 of 1989, decided on 6th March, 1989.
AHMED ALI U.QURESHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
M.L.Shahani for Appellant.

MUHAMMAD WASEEM KHAN

VS

PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION LTD.

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-- ---Ss.25-A, 36 & 38(3)--Dismissal of petition in default--Restoration applicator filed after more than three weeks--Plea of sickness--Medical certificate produce not beyond suspicion inasmuch as neither it bore signatures of petitioner nor his father's name--No affidavit from Doctor filed to show that on the date fused petitioner could not attend Court for reasons beyond his control--Order of Labour Court dismissing application for restoration in circumstances, maintained in appeal. DECISION Heard Mr. M.L. Shahani, Advocate. This appeal is against the order of the learned Presiding Officer, Sind Labour Court No.IV at Karachi, dated 15-12-1988, whereby he dismissed the application for restoration of the grievance application of the appellant which was dismissed in default on 8-10-1988. The relevant portion of the impugned order narrating the history of the case as well as reasons of dismissal is reproduced as under:- "Ordinarily, orders such as impugned orders are passed after keeping in view the previous conduct of the party and in this regard, is seen that the petitioners after filing their affidavit in evidence on 6-7-1988 did not appear on 19-7-1988, 3-9-1988 and also on 22-9-1988. The contention of the petitioners and their learned Advocate in the affidavit in rejonder that the case would not proceed on 22-9-1988 on account of absence of Peshkar or the Stenographer is not supported by the case diary. So far, particularly on 8-10-1988 the date on which the impugned order was passed is concerned the diary shows that the petitioners were called absent and it was noted that they had remained absent on previous four hearings as well and the learned advocate for petitioners had stated that the petitioners were not attending the Court despite their instructions. Then, without casting doubt on the medical certificates it is observed that it has not been stated therein that the conditions of the petitioners were such that they could not intimate either their advocate or this…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492