Case Details

Citation(s)
1961 SLG 318 1961 SLD 318 1961 PLD 452
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal Nos. 11, 12 and 13 of 1961, decided on 9th June, 1961.
A. R. CORNELIUS, C.J., S. A. RAHMAN, FAZLE AKBAR, B. Z. KAIKAUS AND HAMOODUR RAHMAN, JJ
M. F. Rahman, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (S. M. Husain, Advocate, Supreme Court, with him) instructed by Siddiq & Co. Attorneys for Appellants. H. S. Suhrawardy, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, (Mozammal Huq, Advocate, Supreme Court, with him) instruc

Civil Appeal No. 11 of 1961 THE BURMAH OIL COMPANY LIMITED --Appellant

VS

THE TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF CHITTAGONG --Respondent Civil Appeal No. 12 of 1961 THE STANDARD VACUUM OIL COMPANY --Appellant vs THE TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF CHITTAGONG - --Re

Law:

Section:

(a) Notification------ ---Mistake in-May be amended or corrected by authority issuing notification-Notification of the Commissioners of Port of Chittagong dated 14-3-1955 in respect of levy of tolls Power to levy mistakenly referred to as derived from S. 57 (2)(b) Chittagong Port Act (V of 1914)-Clause.(b) to subsection (2) of S. 57 non-existent in Act-mistake due to drafting error--­Notification corrected by Commissioners, by notification dated 11-3-1960 substituting S. 57 (1)(c) for S. 57 (2)(b)-Corrected notification, however, amounting not to mere "making good of an accidental omission but to introducing substantial change and material alteration in notification itself" -Corrected Notification deemed to have been operative from date of issue. (b) Chittagong Port Act (V of 1914)---- ----S. 57-Powers exercised under S. 57 by Commissioners since 1928 (when Chittagong declared major port) not invalid-Objection that Act remained a Provincial Act the disregard of terms of Entry 11, List I, Seventh Schedule, Government of India Act, 1935, held to be "mis­conceived"-Administrator, Lahore Municipality v. Daulat Ram Kapur A I R 1942 F C 14 considered. (c) Words and Phrases----- ---"Tolls"-Meaning and Scope. There may be tolls of many kinds, such as harbour tolls, anchorage tolls, or even a toll for the use of a Railway system itself. In its generic sense a `toll' may be described as a payment of a sum of money in respect of some benefit derived by the payer from the use of some property, service or facility provided by another. `Toll' is not, synonymous with `hire'. It may well be distinct from, and in addition to, a' charge leviable for the use of that property, service or facility. Thus a `toll' realisable by a railway, may be a payment in respect of the use of the railway system itself as distinct from a charge for carriage, cartage, haulage or collection. Sands v. Manistee River Improvement Company 31 Law Ed. U. S. S C R 288 considered. (d) Tolls------ ---Right how acquired. The right to levy a toll is commonly acquired either by some kind of express grant or by statute or by long usage ; thus the nature of the right acquired has to be necessarily considered in…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492