| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1989 SLG 1427 1989 SLD 1427 1989 PLC 600 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
Revision No. LHR-51 of 1989, decided on 22nd February, 1989.
SARDAR MUHAMMAD ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN LODHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
H.R. Haider for Petitioner.
Revision No. LHR-51 of 1989, decided on 22nd February, 1989.
SARDAR MUHAMMAD ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN LODHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
H.R. Haider for Petitioner.
MANAGING PARTNER, MESSRS MALIK & CO. SUCCESSOR OF MUGHAL INDUSTRIES REROLLING MILLS
VS
MUHAMMAD IOBAL
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-- ---Ss. 25-A & 38(3-a)--S. 25-A--Scope--Redress of individual grievance-Collective Bargaining Agent cannot invoke provisions of S. 25-A for its own benefits--Petitioner, General Secretary of Workers Union, seeking direction against employer not to violate operative settlement which provided that in case factory is re-opened workers previously employed would be taken back on duty-Labour Court passing orders that all workers will be re-called if factory restarts-Labour Court, held, not justified in passing such order and stay order could be issued to the extent that petitioner would be recalled if factory restarts--Order of Labour Court modified in revision directing that if petitioner was employee of respondent employer alleged settlement should not be violated so far it benefits the petitioner. JUDGMENT This is a revision reporting that the order dated 4-2-1989 recorded by learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 2, Lahore is without jurisdiction and of no legal effect. 2. The learned lower Court has vide the impugned order directed that the petitioner shall not violate the provisions of settlement dated 6-12-1988 and in case the factory is re-opened the workers previously employed by him would be…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492