Case Details

Citation(s)
1988 SLG 898 1988 SLD 898 1988 PLC 163
Service Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. 7 of 1987, decided on 8th July, 1987.
MUNAWAR ALI KHAN, CHAIRMAN AND MANZOORUL HAQ EFFENDI, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

SHAHEEN MANTHAR AUI ARBAB

VS

MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, LIAQUAT MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, lil(DERABAD

Law:

Section:

(a) Sind Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973---- ---Ss.2(1)(g) & 11--Sind Civil Servants (probation, Confirmation and Seniority) Rules, 1975, R.2--Status of person appointed to a post by initial recruitment--Such person's appointment, held, would be on probation for two years--Services of civil servant co d be terminated without notice during initial or extended period of probation. (b) Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973)-- ---S.4--Sind Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973, R .5--Services of civil servant terminated during probationary period-­Show-cause notice not necessary when services terminated during probation--Procedure prescribed by Rules, however, was followed by Authority--No detailed inquiry was called for in case of such employee--Civil servant's reply to show-cause notice indicated that allegations made against her were not without substance--Appeal against termination of service being devoid of merit was dismissed. Wasiullah for Appellant. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, Addl. A.-G. for Government. Date of hearing: 8th July, 1987 JUDGMENT MUNAWAR ALI KHAN (CHAIRMAN).--This Appeal arose from the order of Medical Superintendent, Liaqat Medical College Hospital, Hyderabad dated 3-2-1985 whereby the services of the appellant Miss. Shaheen Manthar Ali Arbab as Assistant House Keeper, were terminated. The said order was the result of the departmental proceedings taken out against the appellant. To begin with, she was served with a show-cause notice dated 11th February, 1984 wherein she was charged that she was irresponsible and careless in keeping cleanliness and discipline in management Nursing Hospital and that in spite of verbal warnings several times he had not improved. The appellant submitted her reply to the said charges. After taking into consideration her reply and after giving her personal hearing the aforesaid authority passed the impugned order. We heard the arguments addressed, at the bar and also went through the relevant documents. 2. The main submission of the learned counsel for the appellant was that the allegations made against the appellant were vague, and that no detailed inquiry was held to prove the said allegations. He…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492