Case Details

Citation(s)
1988 SLG 812 1988 SLD 812 1988 PLC 32
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. KAR-43 of 1986, heard on 10th February, 1987.
ALI NAWAZ BUDHANI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

TAMIZUDDIN AHMAD KHAN

VS

PAKISTAN STEEL

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-- ---Ss.25-A & 38(3)--Pay scale--Claim for--Workman appointed in specified pay scale mentioned in appointment letter and he was also a signatory to such letter--Claim of higher pay scale by such workman on plea that an employee of same category earlier to his appointment was getting such higher pay scale--Claim rejected by Anomaly Committee set up to examine individual cases on merits in pursuance of settlement between management and C.B.A.--No document or authority produced in support of claim--Grievance petition for such claim, held, was rightly dismissed by Labour Court. Muhammad Ahmed for Appellant. Date of hearing: 10th February, 1987. DECISION This is an appeal filed by the appellant against an impugned order dated 7-1-1986, passed by the Sind Labour Court No. IV, Karachi, who had dismissed the grievance petition of the appellant under section 25-A, I.R.O., 1969. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant was appointed as record-keeper in the respondent establishment on 4-6-1981 in the pay Group IV of wage rate of Rs.250-15-490, instead of his appointment in pay Group V of wage rates of Rs.375-25-700, as is being given to other record-keepers of the establishment, particularly, to one namely Mr. Haleem who was also appointed as .Record Keeper in the year 1976. It was also a case of the appellant that there was no different pay Group and wage rate of the category of the workman, i.e. Record Keeper since 1976 and in the year 1981, except there was a pay Group V of the wage rate of Rs.375-25-700 which also had the similar nature of work. The appellant claimed to have approached the respondent establishment to remove these irregularities and to bring it at par to the appellant with compensation in the pay Group V, as it was-provided to the workers, holding the same category and that though a settlement between the respondent establishment and the C. B. A Union was arrived at on 23-4-1984 to remove the irregularities or aw-/ injustice done in this behalf, but as his grievance was not redressed, therefore, he filed his grievance petition under section 25-A, I.R.O., 1969, before the learned Labour Court.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492