| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1988 SLG 671 1988 SLD 671 1988 PLC 82 |
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Case No. 283/818 of 1986, decided on 28th October, 1986.
S. ABDUL, JABBAR KHAN, CHAIRMAN AND SARFRAZ HASSAN, MEMBER
Masud Ahmad Riaz for Appellant. Manzoor Hussain Bhatti, District Attorney for
Respondents.
Case No. 283/818 of 1986, decided on 28th October, 1986.
S. ABDUL, JABBAR KHAN, CHAIRMAN AND SARFRAZ HASSAN, MEMBER
Masud Ahmad Riaz for Appellant. Manzoor Hussain Bhatti, District Attorney for
Respondents.
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF SHAMI
VS
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (COLLEGES), LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE and another
Law:
Section:
Case No.283/818 of 1986, decided on 28th October, 1986. Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)-- ---S.4--Adverse remarks in A. C. R.--Expunction of--Impugned remarks challenged on grounds of inordinate delay in recording and conveying and also of bias of reporting officer--Head of Department after assessment recommending ignoring impugned remarks--Recommendations of Head of Department who was in a better position to assess correctness and actual worth of both reporting as well as appellant officer, were relied upon by Service Tribunal--Appeal accepted and impugned remarks expunged by Tribunal. Maqsood Alam v. Secretary to Government of the Punjab, Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries Department 1985 P L C (C.S.) 503; Mrs.Safia Imran Malik v. SGA & I. Department 1985 P L C (C.S.) 51 and Fayyaz Ahmad Malhi v. Secretary to Government of the Punjab 1986 P L C (C.S.) 826 ref. JUDGMENT S. ABDUL JABBAR KHAN (CHAIRMAN).--Mr. Muhammad Yousaf Shami, Lecturer (Mathematics), Government F.C. College, Lahore has filed this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunal Act, 1974, in which he has impleaded the Director of Education (Colleges), Lahore Division, Lahore and Director Punjab Instruction (College), Punjab, Lahore as Respondents. 2. By virtue of this appeal he has prayed that the impugned adverse remarks pertaining to the period from 1-1-1969 to 27-6-1969, 1973 and 1975 may be expunged. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the Appellant was conveyed adverse remarks for the above noted periods. He filed Departmental Appeal which was rejected by final Order dated 2-3-1986/6-3-1986. He has now filed this appeal before us for the expunction of the said remarks. 4. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as District Attorney assisted by the representative of the Department and have perused the record of this case carefully with their assistance. The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted as follows:- (1) Regarding adverse remarks for the period from 1-1-1969 to 27-6-969.--It has been argue that the Reporting Officer a become personal and biased against appellant and due to that reason he gave the said adverse remarks which are…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492