| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1988 SLG 2557 1988 SLD 2557 1988 SCMR 1333 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1307 of 1980, decided on 10th May, 1988. (On appeal from the order Dated 30-6-1980 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, passed in R.S.A. No. 584/80). Date of hearing: 10th May, 1988.
MUHAMMAD AFZA1 ZULLAH AND SAAD SAOOD JAN, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1307 of 1980, decided on 10th May, 1988. (On appeal from the order Dated 30-6-1980 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, passed in R.S.A. No. 584/80). Date of hearing: 10th May, 1988.
MUHAMMAD AFZA1 ZULLAH AND SAAD SAOOD JAN, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
HASSAN KHAN and anothers
VS
ZAHEERULLAH and 3 others--Respondents
Law: Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913
Section: 15
Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913)-- ---S.15--Pre-emption suit--sale--Vendees had filed a suit for specific performance of contract of sale which was decreed in their favour--Leave to appeal granted to consider questions whether sale would be deemed to have taken place when the decree for specific performance was passed in favour of vendees; whether sale had not taken place by virtue of the decision of the Court and that the completion of documents or acceptance of the decree by the -debtor, were only formalities which could not change the form and date of sale or that Of the decree for specific performance and to examine the scope of the word sale in such like cases. Abdul Karim v. Fazal Muhammad Shah P L D 1967 S C 411 ref. ORDER MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--This is plaintiffs petition for leave to appeal in a pre-emption matter. 2. The petitioners suit was decreed by the trial Court. The respondents appeal was allowed by the District Court and petitioners suit was dismissed. The High Court dismissed petitioners Regular Second Appeal and affirmed the decision of the First Appellate Court. The petitioners have now sought leave to appeal. 3. The respondents/ vendees had filed a suit for specific performance of contract of sale which was decreed in their favour. The petitioners treated the decree as sale and filed suit for preemption. It has been held in the impugned judgments that unless the decree for specific performance is followed by documents completing the sale, the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492