| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1988 SLG 2422 1988 SLD 2422 1988 SCMR 1069 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 1297 of 1980, decided on 22nd February, 1988. (From the judgment Dated 25-11-1979 of the Lahore High Court in R.F.A. No. 82 of 1978). Date of hearing: 22nd February, 1988.
NASIM HASAN SHAH AND SAAD SAOOD JAN, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petition No. 1297 of 1980, decided on 22nd February, 1988. (From the judgment Dated 25-11-1979 of the Lahore High Court in R.F.A. No. 82 of 1978). Date of hearing: 22nd February, 1988.
NASIM HASAN SHAH AND SAAD SAOOD JAN, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Syed ZAHOOR RUSSIAN SHAH and others
VS
Syed BARKAT HUSSAIN---Respondent
Law: Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913
Section: 15(b)
Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913)-- ---S.15(b)--Suit for pre-emption on grounds that plaintiff was a real brother of vendor and he was a tenant in disputed land--Contention that plaintiff having claimed to be a tenant, Civil Court had no jurisdiction to entertain suit which fell exclusively within competence of Revenue Court rejected by High Court--No reason shown to take a different view in the matter--Contention that under the Muslim Law the right of pre-emption based upon mere relationship with vendor was unenforceble, held, could not be accepted in view of decision of Supreme Court in 1987 SCMR 406--Petition for leave to appeal dismissed. --[Muhammadan Law]. Piran Ditta v. Member Revenue Board 1987 SCMR 406 ref. ORDER SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--This petition for special leave to appeal arises out of a pre-emption suit brought by the respondent. The suit was decreed by the trial Court and the appeal preferred by the petitioners was dismissed on 25-11-1979 by the Lahore High Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the respondent had founded his claim to superior rights on two grounds; first, he was a real brother of the vendor and, second, he was a tenant in the land in dispute. He argued that as the respondent had also claimed to be a tenant the Civil Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit for itβ¦
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492