Case Details

Citation(s)
1988 SLG 2390 1988 SLD 2390 1988 SCMR 978
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 216 of 1979, decided on 27th March, 1988. (On appeal against the judgment Dated 13-11-1979 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in R.S.A. No. 497 of 1979 titled Khurshid Ahmad versus Zafar Iqbal). Date of hearing: 26th and 27th of M
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J., NASIM HASAN SHAH AND SHAFIUR RAHMAN, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

KHURSHID AHMAD---Appellant

VS

ZAFAR IQBAL--Respondent

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 185(3)

(a) West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 [M.L.R.64]--   ---Para. 25(4)--Pre-emption--Scope of restriction placed on alienation of a holding--Ex press. words of clause (4) of para 25 of Land Reforms Regulation restricting right to alienate property, held, would not prohibit a pre-emption claim or a court sale—Prohibition did not cover every transaction of transfer of property but covered voluntary alienations by sale, mortgage, gift or otherwise entered into between two persons.   (b) Pre-emption---   ---Pre-emption claim, claim, held, was not one of purchase or repurchase but of substitution--Concept of substitution itself implied that validity or invalidity of original sale in favour of first vendee devolved on successful pre-emptor who substituted him.   (c) West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 [M.L.R.64]-   --Para. 25(4)--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art .185(3)--Leave of appeal was granted to vendee in a pre-emption suit to examine whether pre-emptors claim to property could succeed so as to violate provisions of para 25 of Land Reforms Regulation, 1959--Sale in favour of appellant himself was neither imperfect nor violative of any provision of law-­   Person substituting him, held, could not bring forth, while substituting vendee, his own incapacities or disqualifications extraneous to and forming no impediment to his right to pre-empt property- -Pre-emption right being a right of substitution and not of sale. purchase or repurchase would remain unaffected by para 25 of Land Reforms Regulation, 1959.   JUDGMENT SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.--Leave to appeal was granted to the vendee in a pre-emption suit to examine, whether the pre-emptors claim to the property could succeed so as to violate the provisions of para 25 of Land Reforms Regulation; 1959. The father and an uncle of the minor plaintiff/pre-emptor alienated land measuring 16 Kanals 9 Marlas in village Dhoorey, Tehsil Gujarkhan and mutations of sale were attested on 26th of September, 1968. The minor instituted a suit through a next friend, his mother, claiming superior right of pre-emption on the ground that he was an heir of both the vendors. While…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492