| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1988 SLG 2234 1988 SLD 2234 1988 SCMR 552 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 114 of 1984, decided on 26th October, 1987. (Against the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, Dated 12th January, 1982 in S.A.O. No. 200 of 1981). Date .of hearing: 26th October, 1987.
NASIM HASAN SHAH, SHAFIUR RAHMAN, SAAD SAOOD JAN AND ALI HUSSAIN QAZILBASH, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Appeal No. 114 of 1984, decided on 26th October, 1987. (Against the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, Dated 12th January, 1982 in S.A.O. No. 200 of 1981). Date .of hearing: 26th October, 1987.
NASIM HASAN SHAH, SHAFIUR RAHMAN, SAAD SAOOD JAN AND ALI HUSSAIN QAZILBASH, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Mst. FAUZIA PARVEEN alias FAUZIA TIWANA--Appellant
VS
Mst. SAHIB KHATOON and others--Respondents
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 13,11
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 185(3)
(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-- ---O.IX, R.13 O.XXXII, R.11--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)--Ex parte decree against minor defendants--Setting aside of--Sufficient cause, what is--Service effected through guardian mother, a Pardahnasheen lady who failed to appear--Effect--Leave to appeal granted to examine whether High Court was justified in dismissing in limine a first appeal against an order passed on appeal whereby the ex parte decree passed against defendant-respondents by Trial Court was set aside on the ground that there was sufficient reason to do so. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-- ---O .IX, R .13 O . XXXII, R.11--Ex parte decree against minor defendants--Setting aside of--Sufficient reason for--Default of guardian--Consequence of--Proper service of summons upon minors/ ladies--Court custodian of interest of minors--Should ensure proper representation of minors--Suit for declaration--Decreed ex parte-Application for setting aside ex parte decree failed--Plea that some of defendants were minors and had not been proceeded against through a guardian, not sustained--Decision reversed in appeal by District Judge, holding that there was no proper service, and that interest of lady and minors should have been meticulously safeguarded by Court--Plaintiffs appeal there against dismissed in limine--Order impugned--Minor respondents having been proceeded against through their guardian mother who defaulted in putting in appearance and Court being custodian of interest of minors, it has to be watchful whether a party discharges its duty or not--Agreeing with view taken by two Courts that this omission to ensure proper representation of minors was a material factor to be taken note of which considering application for setting aside ex parte decree, Supreme Court held that minors were neither properly served nor properly represented--It declined to interfere with concurrent finding of fact recorded by District Judge and upheld by High Court on factual aspect of the case holding further that Purdahnasheen ladies and minors being involved, service should have been got effected in a more inspiring manner than was…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492