| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1988 SLG 1357 1988 SLD 1357 1988 PLC 821 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
Revisions Nos. MN-86 to 88 of 1988, decided on 15th March,1988.
SARDAR MUHAMMAD ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN LADHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Revisions Nos. MN-86 to 88 of 1988, decided on 15th March,1988.
SARDAR MUHAMMAD ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN LADHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN
VS
ZAHID HUSSAIN and 2 others
Law:
Section:
Payment of Wages Act (IV of 1936)--- ---Ss.15 & 17--Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), S.38(3-a)--Revision--Railways employees claim mileage allowance @ 75% of pay on basis of award--Award relied upon not produced--Authority under Payment of Wages Act, 1936 allowing claim and Labour Court in appeal maintaining order of Authority--Appellate order was set aside in revision by Appellate Tribunal and case was remanded to Labour Court for decision afresh after original or duly certified copy of award was brought on record by applicant. Ch. Muhammad Shafiq for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondent (in Revision No. MN-86 of 1988) Syed Ibrar Hussain for Respondents (in Revisions NOs.MN-87 and MN-88 of 1988) Date of hearing: 15th March, 1988. JUDGMENT The revisions captioned above emerge from the decisions dated 3-1-1988 recorded by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No.9, Multan in its appellate jurisdiction, whereby the appeals brought by the petitioner against the decision dated 25-5-1987 recorded by the learned Authority under the Payment of Wages :pct, Multan were dismissed. 2. So far as the revision titled as "Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railways Multan v. Zahid Hussain" mentioned above is concerned, none has appeared for Zahid Hussain. Learned counsel for the remaining respondents has informed that Zahid Hussain has expired during the pendency of the appeal. However, he is not in a position to give the correct date of his death. The learned lower Court, therefore, as the case is being remanded alongwith the other two cases, would see if the legal .representatives of the deceased can be brought on the record and if any legal representative is brought on the record, the appeal will be decided in his presence. 3. The facts are that the respondents who are Special Ticket Examiners claim 75$ mileage allowance on .account of doing the work of census of passengers. They base their claim upon an award. Neither any certified copy of the award nor the notification in which the award was published has been brought on the record by either party. The case…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492