Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-- --Ss.25-A & 38(3)-Special Increment--Pay of worker had been raised by grant of special increment by Chairman of appellant mills who way not competent to grant same under Rules---Chairman however realising; irregularity suspended his order granting special increment--Worker otherwise having no right guaranteed and secured under any law to grant of special increments--Bonus allegedly paid to worker erroneously on 'basis -of alleged increase -in pay also not entitling him to claim increase in pay--Held worker hail no right to claim increased pay-Order--of Labour Court allowing grievous petition of- worker was set aside ,in .circumstances. 1988 P L C 749; 1987 P L C 806 and 1987 P L C (C.S.) 787 ref. N.A. Talpur, for Appellants. Date of hearing: 10th February, 1988. DECISION This is an appeal filed by the appellant Mills against an impugned order. dated 6-10-19'87, passed by the Sind Labour Court No. VI at Hyderabad, who had allowed' the grievance petition of the respondent under section 25-A, I.R.O. 1969, directing the appellant Mills to pay salary to the respondent as per increase granted by the Chairman of the Mills -with effect from 1-10-1986 with all consequential benefits. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the ease, are that the respondent claimed to have been appointed in the appellant. Mills on 10-6-1986 with a basic pay of Rs.725.00 per. month plus allowances and that vide letter dated 5-11-1986, his basic pay- was increased to Rs.3105.00 per month with effect from. 1-10-1986 and so bonus in the month of November, 1986 was also paid to him on the basis of the said increase. Further, the claim of the respondent was that for the month of October, 1981 and onwards, he was not held his salaries at the increased rate' therefore he sent a grievance notice to the appellant Mills; on -2-4-1987 followed by the present grievance petition under section 25-A, I.R.O. 1969. 3. The appellant Mills resisted the, petition on the grounds that on account of exercise of influence by the respondent, the Chairman of the appellant Mills had approved the increase in his pay, under a political, pressure vide, an order, dated…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492