Case Details

Citation(s)
1988 SLG 1298 1988 SLD 1298 1988 PLC 728
Service Tribunal, N.W.F.P.
Appeal No. 34 of 1987, decided on 20th June, 1988.
MALIK MUHAMMAD PARVEZ KHAN, CHAIRMAN AND SAHIBZADA MOHAMMAD FARIDOON KHAN, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

ZAHIR SHAH

VS

SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SWAT and 2 others

Law:

Section:

North-West Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974)-- ---S. 4--Dismissal from service--Superintendent of Police in capacity of competent Authority awarded major penalty to appellant same officer having been appointed to act as officiating Deputy Inspector-General of Police decided and rejected appeal of appellant in that capacity--Impugned order being illegal, appellant re­instated in service with all back benefits. Iqbal Hussain for Appellant. Date of institution: 7th April, 1987. JUDGMENT MALIK MUHAMMAD PARVEZ KHAN (CHAIRMAN).--Appellant Zahir Shah was dismissed from service vide impugned order dated 8-10-1986 by respondent No. 1. He filed an appeal before the D.I.G. Police, Malakand Range, Saidu Sharif, Swat which was rejected by him vide order dated 16-12-1986 and his further appeal/ representation to the I.G. Police, NWFP, Peshawar was rejected on 2-3-1987 received by the appellant on 7-3-1987. According to him he was serving as Head Constable in Swat Police and was posted at P.S Ghaligi in Saidu Sub-Division. He took two accused to the Court on 20-7-1986 and produced one of them before the Court, while the other accused was kept by F.C. Mohammad Zahid and when he came out the accused Habib-ur-Rehman was missing and was informed by constable Mohammad Zahid that he left the accused un-attended and went to urinate himself and on his coming back he found him missing. He reported the matter of P.S Ghaligi against FIR No. 170/86. Later on accused Habib-ur-Rehman was arrested and he verified the statement of Mohammad Zahid Constable. Respondent No. 1, however, issued a show-cause notice to him which was replied but later on an enquiry was conducted and the Enquiry Officer recommended major punishment for the appellant which was announced by respondent No. 1 on 8-10-1986. Appellant filed an appeal and respondent No. 2 remanded the case to the Enquiry Officer per order dated 4-11-1986 to record the statement of the accused Habib-ur-Rehman. The Enquiry Officer then obtained the copy of the statement of accused Habib-ur-Rehman recorded under section 161, Cr.P.C. and submitted his report by exonerating the appellant from the charge. The said respondent…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492