| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1987 SLG 990 1987 SLD 990 1987 PLC 105 |
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Case No. 956/616 of 1985, decided on 3rd August, 1986.
FAIZ KARIM, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Case No. 956/616 of 1985, decided on 3rd August, 1986.
FAIZ KARIM, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMAD SHARIF KAMYANA
VS
DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOOD, MULTAN REGION and another
Law:
Section:
Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)-- ---S. 4--Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline Rules), 1975, R.6--Dismissal from service--Copy of inquiry report not found to have been supplied to accused Government servant which was a material omission--Order of dismissal set aside and case remanded for rectification of mistake and starting proceedings from stage of supplying copy to accused appellant. Mir Muhammad's case P L D 1981 SC 176ref. M.A. Riaz for Appellant. Khurshid Akbar Cheema, Deputy District Attorney for Respondents. JUDGMENT Muhammad Sharif Kamyana, ex-Food Inspector, has filed this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service 7 Tribunals Act, 1974 against the orders, dated 1-10-1984 of the Deputy Director Food, Multan Region, Multan, vide which the appellant was dismissed from the service and beside that the penalty of Rs.21,11,653.47 was inflicted over the appellant and the orders, dated 16-11-1985 of the Director Food communicated on 16-12-1985, vide which the departmental appeal was dismissed. The appellant has impleaded the Deputy Director Food, Multan Region and Director Food, Punjab as respondents Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. 2. Through this appeal the appellant has prayed that the impugned orders may be set aside and the appellant be re-instated in the service and the orders of the recovery also to be withdrawn. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant was charge-sheeted as follows: - (1) You were posted at Pipli Wheat Purchase Centre, vide orders contained in Endst. No. 1484-1585, dated 18-4-1984 and where required to report for duty at new place of posting by 21-4-1984, but you did not join, you were again directed in the staff meeting held on 30-4-1984 to assume charge at Pipli Centre and start procurement of wheat with effect from 1-5-1984 but you did not care." (2)You remained absent about upto 9-5-1984 and were asked to explain reasons, vide No. PE-84/1990, dated 16-5-1984 but your reply is still awaited. (3)You started purchase of wheat from 12-5-1984, instead of 1-5-1984 causing a setback in the procurement drive, resulting that only a little about 3,000 tons wheat has been purchased at Pipli against the target of…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492