Case Details

Citation(s)
1987 SLG 933 1987 SLD 933 1987 PLC 9
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Case No. 252/870 of 1984, decided on 11th April, 1985.
ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHARY, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN SHAH

VS

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JHANG and 2 others

Law:

Section:

Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)-- ---S. 4--Punjab Police Department, Standing Order No. 32, para.18-­Adverse remarks, expunction of--Representation by appellant dismissed by Authority--Appeal before Tribunal filed after 5 months of dismissal of representation--Appellant, held, was required to file appeal within 30 days of rejection of representation by Authority--Reasons advanced by appellant for condonation of delay being not convincing were rejected by Service Tribunal. Anwar Ali Chaudhry for Appellant. A. G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents. JUDGMENT Muhammad Hussain Shah has made this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974, wherein he has impleaded the Superintendent of Police, Jhang, the Superintendent of Police, Faisalabad of Police and the Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Faisalabad Range, Faisalabad as respondents. 2. By virtue of this appeal the appellant has prayed that the adverse remarks for the year 1981 communicated to him on 24-10-1983 be declared as illegal, void, without lawful authority and of no legal effect, to be set aside. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant was conveyed to the appellant vide memo: dated 26-5-1982 of the Deputy Inspector-­General of Police, Sargodha Range, Sargodha as follows:- "Investigation of crime against property. "Below average" Preventive action and action under local and special laws. "Below average" "General remarks." Who failed to work out any case of theft in city and also failed to take any preventive action during five months as subordinate. He will have to work extremely hard to learn Police Work. The appellant made a representation to the Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Faisalabad Range, Faisalabad which was-rejected, vide order, dated 24-10-1983. Then, the appellant made another representation to the Additional Inspector-General of Police, Punjab Lahore which was filed by the Superintendent of Police, Faisalabad vide No.318/CRC, dated 8-2-1984 with the following remarks:- "According to para No.18 of revised Standing Order No.32, the officers adversely reported upon will have only one right of making a representation and absolute finality…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492