| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1987 SLG 565 1987 SLD 565 1987 SCMR 1505 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeal No. 65 of 1980, decided on 4th May, 1987. (From the judgment and order, dated 1261979 of the Lahore High Court passed in Crl. A. No. 390 of 1977).
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J., NASIM HASAN SHAH, SHAFIUR RAHMAN, ALI HUSSAIN QAZILBASH AND MIAN BURHANUDDIN KHAN, JJ
Muhammad Aslam Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Appellants. Rao M. Yousaf Khan, Advocate-on-Record for the State
Criminal Appeal No. 65 of 1980, decided on 4th May, 1987. (From the judgment and order, dated 1261979 of the Lahore High Court passed in Crl. A. No. 390 of 1977).
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J., NASIM HASAN SHAH, SHAFIUR RAHMAN, ALI HUSSAIN QAZILBASH AND MIAN BURHANUDDIN KHAN, JJ
Muhammad Aslam Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Appellants. Rao M. Yousaf Khan, Advocate-on-Record for the State
JAMAITULLAH and another
VS
STATE
Law:
Section:
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-----S. 302/34 read with S. 300, Exception 4--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)--Leave to appeal granted to consider (i) whether High Court had failed to give a finding on what it itself termed as "crucial question involved in case" (ii) whether it had taken a correct view of the law as to application of Exception 4 to S. 300, Penal Code and (iii) whether after holding that injuries were caused in a sudden fight, it could still have held that "common intention" to cause death had been formed during the incident. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-- ---S. 302/34--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185--Appeal-Non-appearance of counsel--Effect--Practice and procedure--Counsel for appellants not appearing before Court--Appeal treated as a jail appeal.--[Practice and procedure]. (c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-- --S. 302 read with Ss. 34 & 300, Exception 4--Evidence--Broad daylight occurrence witnessed by as many as five witnesses, three of whom had stamps of injuries on their persons and, therefore, their presence at spot could not be doubted--Accused persons too had injuries and had admitted occurrence though with a different version-All witnesses were unanimous in accusing the accused for launching attack and giving stab blows to deceased as well as to three eye-witnesses--Medical evidence and motive going a long way to establish case of prosecution against the two accused persons--Defence version not only vague but also not at all convincing and was rightly discarded by Courts below--Injuries were not caused in a sudden flare-up as sufficient material was available on record to establish that it was a case of pre-concert--Accused having launched attack with common intention, they were covered by provision of S. 34, Penal Code--Accused, held, had been properly convicted and sentenced for the murder of deceased and for murderous assault on three eye-witnesses. JUDGMENT ALI HUSSAIN QAZILBASH, J.--This is an appeal by leave against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, dated 12-6-1979, whereby the conviction and sentence of the two appellants namely, Abdullah and his brother Jamaitullah, under…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492