| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1960 SLG 360 1960 SLD 360 1960 PLD 62 |
West Pakistan
M. Z. KHAN, MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE
S. M. Ansari for Petitioner.
M. Z. KHAN, MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE
S. M. Ansari for Petitioner.
KEEMA
VS
JAN MUHAMMAD
Law:
Section:
(a) Practice Decision of Full Board Cannot be reconsidered by Member. (b) West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act (XI of 1957), S. 8 (2) Review petition must be filed within 90 days Time spent in prosecuting case before Full Board not excluded. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: M. Z. KHAN, MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE This purports to be a petition for the review of my order dated 6 10 1958, dismissing in default the review petition filed by the petitioner. The order shows that the petitioner was present, but his counsel was absent, as he was busy in another Court. The petitioner was not prepared to argue the case in the absence of his counsel, who had notice for the hearing of his case in my Court. Since the counsel had notice of the case, he should have been present in my Court at the prescribed hour, or should have prayed for an adjournment well in advance. The petition was thus dismissed on good grounds. The, petitioner's counsel was allowed to urge all the points he wanted to raise. Even after considering those points I find that the petition cannot succeed even on merits. The revision petition which was treated as such by my predecessor and allowed by his order dated 2 7 1957. By that order the respondent's appointment as Lambardar by the Collector was restored The present petitioner filed a revision petition against that order before the Full Board which dismissed it by its order dated 7 3 58. It was alleged before the Full Board that order dated 2 7 57, passed by my…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492