Law:

Section:

THIS ORDER PASSED BY: M. Z. KHAN, MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE---.--- The petitioners and the respondent jointly purchased lot Nos. 6 and 7 of State land in auction in 1947 48. After the payment of the purchase price, conveyance deeds were executed on 17 11 48. The shares of the petitioners and the respondent in these deeds were J and I respectively. Mutation Nos. 446 and 447 were accordingly sanctioned in 1949. These entries have continued in the revenue records. The petitioners now contend that the shares have been wrongly entered and on their representation mutation No. 604, was entered in 1956. According to the petitioners the shares of the parties should be half and half. This mutation was rejected by the Revenue Officer on 13 11 56. The Collector set aside this order on 17 2 57, but the Additional Commissioner by his order in revision restored the order of the Revenue Officer. It is clear that the prayer of the petitioners, in fact, is that the entry in the revenue record which was made at a result of the attestation of mutation Nos. 446 and 447 on 3 6 49 should be corrected. In P L D 1950 Ph. (Rev.) 458, it was held that the facts of this case are almost exactly similar to the facts in the case Harnam Singh v. Ishar Singh. 1n that case fraud was alleged on the part of the Patwari, while in the present case fraud is alleged on the part of the petitioner in collusion with…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492