Law:

Section:

(a) Lambardar Appointment Candidate old and having defective sight Not suitable Appointment of Sarbrah held not justified. (b) Lambardar Appointment Candidate having no property in Patti Not to be appointed. (c) Lambardar Appointment Rajput appointed in one Patti¬ Suitable candidate from Jats having numerical strength in Patti may be appointed in other Patti. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: M. Z KHAN, MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE---.--- These two petitions R. O. R.1,No. 320 of 1958 59 (Badar Din v. Sardar Ali) and R. O. R. No. 23 of 1959 60 (Muhammad Siddiq v. Sardar Ali) may be taken up together, as they relate to the same order. Respondent Sardar Ali is 80 years of age. He is a Rajput, which is the second numerically strong tribe in the Patti. He pled a petition that owing to his age anal defective sight, hg was not in a position to perform the duties of a Lambardar and so a Sarbrah may be appointed. In R. O. R. No. 99 of 1957 58 (Rehamat Khan v. Abdul Rehman) it was held that the appointment of a Sarbrah is not intended for such cases. The respondent has no property in Patti Sant Singh in which he has been appointed. In the circumstances of the case, I do not find adequate justification for re adjusting the Patties in order that the land of the respondent might fall in the Patti in question. In view of what is stated above, there was no reasonable ground for appointing Sardar Ali as Lambardar. Muhammad Siddiq has 10 acres of land in the…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492