Case Details

Citation(s)
1960 SLG 333 1960 SLD 333 1960 PLD 36
West Pakistan
Appeal No. 64 of 1958 59, decision dated: 11-02-1960, District Quetta.
M. W. ABBASI, MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE
Ijaz Hussain Batalvi for Appellant. . Kh. Abdur Rahim for
Respondents.

CHAMAN TRANSPORT COMPANY

VS

BOGRA TRANSPORT COMPANY AND ANOTHER

Law:

Section:

(a) Route permit Permit holder is bound to keep vehicle in fit condition for satisfactory service. (b) Route permit Existing operator has equal claim with new applicant. (c) Route permit Previous record of operator unsatisfactory. T. A. justified in granting permit to other applicant after fully complying with procedure. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: M. W. ABBASI, MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE---.--- The petitioner Company operated Chaman Quetta route from 1948 55 with four permits. Out of its four permits, one of its off shoots, Mujahid Co., secured two in 1953. Then another off shoot of the petitioner Company, which is now respon¬dent No. 2 (Bogra Transport Company), cot an additional service on the same route from R. T. A. to 1955. Lastly the petitioner Company lost its remaining two permits in 1959 which were allotted to another Company viz Shah Muhammad Transport Co. The petitioner did not file an appeal against the loss of these two permits. But he filed a writ petition before the High Court in respect of the additional service granted to the Bogra Transport Company in 1955. The High Court cancelled its allotment on the ground that R. T. A. had not complied with the procedure laid' down in section 57 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The High Court did not adjudicate upon the claims of the parties and left it to R. T. A. to pass an order on merits. R. T. A. after complying with the procedure prescribed in section 57 and weighing the claims and counter claims of the competitors decision dated: the 20th November 1958, that the Bogra Transport Company should be granted the additional Service on Chaman Quetta route for three years. It is against this order that the petitioner has filed an appeal before me. R. T. A. has furnished this Court with a very detailed report dated the 30th April 1959, offering comments on all the petitioner's pleadings. It would appear from this report that the petitioner had six very 'old vehicles, either 1941 or 1942 model, and per¬sistently failed to produce certificates of their road worthiness which were called for by R. T. A. more than once under the Rules. Further the petitioner's services completely broke down from November 1953 to January 1954.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492