Case Details

Citation(s)
1987 SLG 318 1987 SLD 318 1987 SCMR 351
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeals Nos. 101 of 1978 and 191 of 1980, decision dated: 4-11-1986.(On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, dated_ 29-7-1978 in Criminal Appeal No. 461 of 1975 and Criminal Revision No. 779 of 1975)
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J., NASIM HASAN SHAH, SHAFIUR RAHMAN AND SAAD SAOOD, JAN, JJ
Kh. Muhammad Sharif, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Appellant (in Cr. A. No. 101 of 1978 and for
Respondent No. 1 (in Cr.A. No. 191 of 1980). Ch.Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on-Record (absent)

JAHAZ KHAN and another

VS

THE STATE and others

Law:

Section:

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-----Ss. 302, 148 & 149--Evidence--High Court being of view that role attributed to two of accused by eye-witnesses was highly improbable for they were alleged to have fired at deceased from a place where deceased could not have been possibly visible to them--Eye-witnesses stating that firing was on a large scale but had it been so the deceased would have received many more injuries than were found by the doctor-­Reasons given by High Court in not placing reliance upon eye-witnesses not insubstantial--Doctor finding blackening around entry wounds of deceased which showed that deceased was shot at from a much closer range than what eye-witnesses had stated--Eye-witness account, held, could not, in circumstances, be safely accepted without corroboration. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)- ---S. 302--Evidence--Empty cartridge picked from scene of occurrence found to have been fired from gun recovered from possession of accused--Such evidence believed by both Trial Court and High Court--No justification for taking a different view in the mattes and there could be, therefore, little doubt that accused was one of the persons who had fired at deceased-- Accused's conviction for offence under S. 302, P.P. C. held, was fully justified. (c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)- ---Ss. 302, 148 & 149--Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417-­Appeal against acquittal--No corroboration of whatsoever nature available to support ocular testimony with regard to participation of accused in occurrence--Acquittal of accused, held, was justified in circumstances. (d) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-- ---S. 302--Sentence--Trial Court in imposing upon accused lesser penalty (imprisonment for life) prescribed for offence under S. 302, P.P.C., giving reasons for doing so--High Court, without recording any finding that reasons advanced by Trial Court were perverse or that sentence awarded by it was grossly inadequate, enhancing accused's sentence to death--High Court, held, was not justified in interfering with discretion exercised by trial Court in circumstances of case--Sentence of death imposed upon accused set aside and instead imposed imprisonment for life but…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492