| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1987 SLG 1658 1987 SLD 1658 1987 SCMR 875 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 680 of 1981, decided on 9th March, 1987. (On appeal from the order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 24-3-1981 in I.C.A. No. 38 of 1975).Date of hearing: 9th March, 1987.
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN AND SAAD SAOOD, JAN, JJ
Dawood Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Guftar Shah P L D 1981 S C 225 ref. Syed Sharif Hussain Bokhari, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner's counsel. Nemo for
Respondent
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 680 of 1981, decided on 9th March, 1987. (On appeal from the order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 24-3-1981 in I.C.A. No. 38 of 1975).Date of hearing: 9th March, 1987.
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN AND SAAD SAOOD, JAN, JJ
Dawood Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Guftar Shah P L D 1981 S C 225 ref. Syed Sharif Hussain Bokhari, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner's counsel. Nemo for
Respondent
SANAULLAH BUTT--Petitioner
VS
THE MASTER OF THE MINT, PAKISTAN MINT, LAHORE-Respondent
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)- ---Art. 212(3)--Natural justice, principles of--Contention that before making order of termination of his Service, petitioner was not given a show-cause notice nor supplied with a copy of Inquiry Officer's report and consequently order of termination was bad in law as it offended against the principles of natural justice, held, could not be accepted in view of decision of Supreme Court in P E -D 1981 S C 225-Contention that certain important documents were withheld from petitioner during course of inquiry found to be factually incorrect--Petition for leave to appeal dismissed. JUDGMENT SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--This is a petition for special leave to appeal from the order, dated 24-3-1981 of the Lahore High Court dismissing the Intra-Court Appeal preferred by the petitioner against the dismissal of the writ petition wherein he had challenged the order of termination of his services. 2. The petitioner was employed as an Assistant Bullion Keeper in the Pakistan Mint at Lahore. There were allegations of misconduct, inefficiency and subversive activities against him. Consequently, a charge-sheet was issued to him on 31-8-1974 and departmental proceedings were taken. An inquiry was held into the allegations leveled against him. To begin with, he participated in the inquiry but later he boycotted the proceedings. In due course, the Inquiry Committee submitted its finding to the Master of Mint who terminated his services. The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court to call in question the legality of the order by which his services were terminated. It was dismissed by a learned Single Judge on the ground that before approaching the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492