| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1987 SLG 1618 1987 SLD 1618 1987 SCMR 811 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 849 of 1981, decided on 2nd March, 1987. (On appeal from the of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 13-6-1981 in R. F. A. No. 63 of 1977. ) Date of hearing: 2nd March, 1987
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN AND SAAD SAOOD, JAN, JJ
A.R. Sheikh, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Kh. Mushtaq Ahmad Advocate- on-Record for Petitioners. M.A. Bajwa, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate- on-Record for
Respondents
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 849 of 1981, decided on 2nd March, 1987. (On appeal from the of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 13-6-1981 in R. F. A. No. 63 of 1977. ) Date of hearing: 2nd March, 1987
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN AND SAAD SAOOD, JAN, JJ
A.R. Sheikh, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Kh. Mushtaq Ahmad Advocate- on-Record for Petitioners. M.A. Bajwa, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate- on-Record for
Respondents
AKBAR ALI and others--Petitioners
VS
TE PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB and others-Respondents
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)- ---Art. 185(3)--Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 149--Deficiency in court-fee--High Court denying permissionmake up deficiency at appeal stage--Leave to appeal granted to consider contention that before dismissing appeal, High Court ought to have given petitioners an opportunity to make up deficiency. Siddique Khan v Abdul Shakur Khan P L D 1984 S C 289 ref. JUDGMENT SAAD SAOOD JAN, J--This is a petition for special leave to appeal from the of the Lahore High Court in a regular first appeal. 2.The land belonging to the petitioners was acquired by the Provincial Government for the construction of a carriage-way between the Lahore and Sheikhupura. The petitioners were not satisfied with the amount of compensations determined by the Land Acquisition Collector in his award. Upon their application the Collector made a reference to a civil Court. The learned Senior Civil Judge who was seized of the matter enhanced the amount of compensations. The petitioners were still dissatisfied and they preferred a regular first appeal in the High Court 3. The court-fee paid on the memorandum of appeal bore only a small proportion to the amount that was actually payable. The…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492