Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ---Ss. 25-A & 38(3)--West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)--Dismissal from service-­Double employment--Employee dismissed from service for misconduct allegedly on account of accepting double employment--Even otherwise neither Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 nor West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment. (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 forbidding double employment although morally it was improper--Appeal against re-instatement of employee was dismissed--Back benefits not allowed. Azmatullah Khan for Appellant. Date of hearing: 16th March, 1986. DECISION The impugned order, dated 3-12-1985, is challenged by the appellant. 2. Rashidullah, an applicant (respondent herein) filed and application under section 25-A, I.R.O., 1969 for his re-instatement and back benefits. 3. The facts are that Rashidullah was employed as a Driver in Pakistan Swedish Institute of Technology since 1976. He was in search of Government service and as such he took up an employment with appellant No.l Le, the Karachi Transport Corporation. He further submitted that the said Institute after learning that he was also employed by K. T. C. dismissed him from service on 17-9-1984 under the Sind Civil Service (Efficiency s Discipline) Rules, 1973, and the copy of the said order was also delivered to the appellant No. 2, namely, K. T. C. What the K. T. C. did, it also issued a charge-sheet to the respondent on 29-9-1984, for having been employed in two different organizations. Rashidullah submitted a satisfactory explanation to the charge-sheet but he was dismissed from the service of the K. T. C. He, therefore, gave a notice and subsequently a grievance petition under section 25-A, I. R. O. 1969, was filed. 4. The stand taken by the K.T.C. is that he could not have served the two organizations simultaneously and it is against the Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968, and the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, and he was rightly dismissed. 5. The evidence was taken and the matter was heard. 6. I have heard the appellant. The respondent has been dismissed from service by the…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492