Case Details

Citation(s)
1986 SLG 2488 1986 SLD 2488 (1986) 160 ITR 243
Rajasthan High Court
D.B. IT REFERENCE Nos. 25 OF 1976 AND 21 OF 1978 FEBRUARY 5, 1986
M.C., JAIN AND K.S. LODHA, JJ.

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Additional Commissioner of IncomE tax

v.

Manaklal Porwal

Law:

Section:

Section 4 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Individual - Assessability of - Assessee's claim that he had only one-fourth share in partnership firm was negatived by ITO as that firm had been earlier held to be not genuine - However, High Court on reference had held firm to be genuine - Whether in view of firm being genuine, assessee's claim that he had only one-fourth share therein had to be upheld - Held, yes Facts The assessee was partner in a firm which had been held to be not genuine for the assessment years prior to 1958-59. For the assessment years 1958-59 to 1960-61, the Tribunal held that the said firm was genuine and a reference at the revenue's instance was made to the High Court. For the assessment years 1959-60 to 1961-62 the assessee's contention that he had only one-fourth share in the partnership firm as a partner was negatived by the ITO. However, the AAC upheld the assessee's claim and the Tribunal confirmed the AAC's order. On reference : Held In D.B. Income-tax Reference No. 33 of 1976, relating to the firm for the assessment years 1958-59 to 1960-61 it had been held that the said partnership firm was a genuine firm. Therefore, it followed that the assessee was simply a partner of that firm having one-fourth share. So in his personal assessment only his one-fourth share from that firm was includible as a partner and the Tribunal was justified in taking that view. B.R. Arora for the Applicant. K.C. Bhandari and A.D. Mehta for the Respondent. Order Jain, J. - In the above two references, the following question of law has been referred to this Court for its opinion : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that only one-fourth share from the firm Manaklal Porwal was includible in the assessment of Shri Manaklal Porwal in his individual capacity?" 2. We may state a few facts giving rise to the above references. In respect of the two assessment years prior to 1958-59, a finding was reached that Manaklal Porwal is not a genuine firm and on that basis registration was refused. That finding was subsequently changed in respect of the assessment years 1958-59 to 1960-61 and on the direction by this…
πŸ”’
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492