| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1986 SLG 2379 1986 SLD 2379 1986 PLC 987 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
Petition No. 262 of 1986, decided on 29th May, 1986.
GHULAM ABBAS KHAN, PRESIDING OFFICER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Petition No. 262 of 1986, decided on 29th May, 1986.
GHULAM ABBAS KHAN, PRESIDING OFFICER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
BISMILLAH LABOUR UNION
VS
THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS; MULTAN REGION, MULTAN and another
Law:
Section:
(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-- ---S. 49 (3)--Industrial dispute---Appearance of legal practitioner-Requirement--Permission to be represented by legal practitioner, held. is necessary when "industrial dispute" was pending in Labour girt and not otherwise. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII d 1969)-- ---S. 2(xiii)--Industrial dispute, connotation of--Registration of trade union--Where dispute between parties related to registration of trade union, registering authority being neither employer of members of same nor a workman, such dispute, held, would not fall within ambit of "Industrial dispute". (e) Industrial Relations Ordinate (XXIII of 1969)---- ---Ss. 2 (xiii) & 8-A--"Industrial dispute", connotation of-Right guaranteed or secured by or under any law, award or settlement have been exempted from term "industrial dispute" no permission, held, was required to engage legal practitioner for appearance before Labour Court. ORDER This order shall dispose of two applications-both moved by the Bismillah Labour Union through its General Secretary Muhammad Hanif Sabri, Punjab Road Transport Corporation, Intercity Depot, Multan, seeking permission to engage a legal practitioner as its counsel under section 49 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 and a restraining order against the appearance of S.M. Abbas Qureshi, Advocate on behalf of respondent No.2 respectively. 2. In the first application, it has been stated that proceedings in hand revolve around complicated legal issues which are beyond the approach of the office-bearers of the appellant union because they are laymen. In the given situation, the appearance of a legal practitioner on their behalf, to safeguard their interests and the general interest of the establishment, is necessary. As such necessary permission for appointment of a legal practitioner, under section 49 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance,. 1969 may be granted. 3. In the second application, the appellant says that legal practitioners have been debarred to appear in the Labour Court. They can appear in the Court by obtaining necessary permission under section 49 ibid. Without obtaining said permission S.M.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492