Case Details

Citation(s)
1986 SLG 2318 1986 SLD 2318 1986 PLC 896
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Case No. 171 of 1986, decided on 26th April, 1986.
S. ABDUL, JABBAR KHAN, CHAIRMAN AND MIAN FAIZ KARIM, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ

VS

DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD, BAHAWALPUR

Law:

Section:

Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975----- ---R. 6--Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S.4--Disciplinary action--Food grains supervisor was imposed penalty of recovery of amount due to damage/shortage of wheat--Claim of G.P. Fund and balance of pay during L.P.R. also included in petition--Petition, held, would suffer from legal defect being not in form of appeal and nobody having been impleaded as respondent--Non-filing of copy of impugned order from which such civil servant felt aggrieved and petition being time-barred would be further considerations for rejection of same--Petition of civil servant being defective and showing no cause of action would not be maintainable in circumstances. Petitioner in Person. Ghulam-us-Sayyadain, Deputy District Attorney for Respondent. JUDGMENT MIAN FAIZ KARIM (MEMBER).-----Muhammad Siddiq Retired Food-grain Supervisor, Amroka, District Bahawalnagar, has filed a petition on the ground that though he was retired on 8-1-1980 and his L.P.R. expired on 8-1-1981 but he was given half pay for period of the L. P. R . and was retired when actually he was under suspension. Beside that the petitioner contended that he has not been paid G.P. Fund which is approximately Rs.6,000. The petitioner further stated that during Storage Scheme of Wheat for the year 1976-77 of Amroka Centre, District Bahawalnagar, the Deputy Director, Food, Bahawalpur ordered recovery of Rs.1,56,000 as penalty over him of which Rs.30,000 were remitted by the Director Food, Lahore and the balance of Rs.1,26,000 the petitioner has yet to pay to the department. According to the version of the petitioner the penalty was unjustified. The petitioner has prayed that the entire amount be set aside and the petitioner be paid arrears of pay, gratuity and pension. 2. Before the case could be admitted to regular hearing the petitioner was heard in person on 26-4-1986. He narrated the same facts namely that he was retired on 8-1-1980 but has not been paid any arrears of pay and the G.P. Fund. The petitioner also contended that he was imposed penalty of Rs.1,56,000 by the Deputy Director Food during Storage Scheme of Wheat for the year 1976-77…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492