| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1986 SLG 2289 1986 SLD 2289 1986 PLC 789 |
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Cases Nos. 78/811, 95/924, 108/957 and 109/958 of 1981.
S. ABDUL, JABBAR KHAN, CHAIRMAN, MALIK ZAWWAR HUSSAIN AND ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHRY, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Cases Nos. 78/811, 95/924, 108/957 and 109/958 of 1981.
S. ABDUL, JABBAR KHAN, CHAIRMAN, MALIK ZAWWAR HUSSAIN AND ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHRY, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Ch. MUHAMMAD SHARIF and others
VS
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, S.&.G.A. DEPARTMENT and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)-- ---S. 4--Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), S.21----Punjab Government Rules of Business, 1974, R. 11 and Sched. III--Seniority matter--Order passed by Secretary to Government in concerned Department challenged before Tribunal--Objection that right of representation to next higher authority, having not been availed of appeal before Tribunal was not competent--Matter not required to be placed before Governor under Punjab Government Rules of Business, 1974--Impugned order, held, was final and objection of absence of right of representation to next higher authority was overruled. (b) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)----- ---S. 4--Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5--Appeal before Tribunal-Limitation--'A' claiming seniority over 'B' and 'C'--During pendency of appeal before Tribunal Government informing Tribunal that claim of 'A' had been accepted--Tribunal holding that grievance of 'A' had been redressed, therefore, appeal of 'A' became in-fructuous and announced in presence of parties in open Court--'B' and 'C' not challenging order of Tribunal before appropriate forum and coming up in appeal before Tribunal after about one year against their seniority so fixed below 'A'--No application for condonation of delay made--Appeal, in circumstances, held, was time-barred and liable to dismissal. 1984 Y L C (C.S.) 261; 1976 P L C(C.S.T.) 15(2); 1980 P L C (C.S.) 238 and 1980 P L C (65) 555 rel. (c) Civil Service Rules. Punjab- ---Vol. I, Part I, R. 2--Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974, R.2 (b)--Cadre--Functional unit-Posts sanctioned together, held, would constitute a separate unit--Posts of Deputy Directors sanctioned by single sanction order of Industries and Mineral Development--Deputy Director Mineral Development, in circumstances, held, at par in status of cadre with Deputy Directors Industries and they would belong to combined seniority list. (d) Civil service-- ---Seniority--Person on surplus pool not absorbed in different Department but continuously working in parent department without any break, held, would not loose his seniority and would not be considered as…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492