Law:

Section:

Industrial dispute- ---Pay, of higher post, cannot be claimed unless competent authority orders employee to discharge duties of higher post. S. Intisar Hussain for Appellant. Bashir Ahmad for Respondent. Date of hearing: 21st January, 1985. JUDGMENT The decision, dated 18-12-1984 recorded by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 9, Multan has been challenged, whereby the grievance petition of the respondent was partly accepted and he was directed to be treated as Cabinman from the date of his recruitment in service fixing his pay and salary accordingly. The respondent was awarded back benefits for three years immediately from the date of the lodging of the grievance petition. 2. The respondent was recruited as Pointsman on 15-i1-1968. His case is that although he was appointed as Pointsman, yet right from the date of his appointment he was made to work as Cabinman. He was promoted as Shunting Porter on 16-6-1976 but according to him; he continued to work as Cabinman. Admittedly, there is no written order to the effect that the respondent may function as Cabinman. The respondent did not disclose under whose verbal orders he had been working as Cabinman. The respondent did not examine any witness in support of his solitary statement. His statement stood controverted by the evidence of P.W. 1 who stated that the respondent never worked as Cabinman before he was promoted as such…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492