Law:

Section:

Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)- ---S. 4--Adverse remark s--Expunction--Police Sub-Inspector serving only for four months under Reporting Officer--Graded below average in "Investigation of crime against Property" and "Preventive action" and not fit for service beyond 25 years service--Remarks not sub­stantiated by Reporting Officer in reply to representation--"Investi­gation, held, cannot be judged merely on value of recovered property-­Record in3icative that appellant did arrest some persons as preventive action and remarks without comparing previous figures found not justified--Tribunal further expressing view that fitness for service on completion of 25 years cannot be judged in four months--Impugned, remarks, in circumstance directed to be expunged. Anwar Ali Chaudhry for Appellant. A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents. JUDGMENT MIAN FAIZ KARIM (MEMBER). --Muhammad Zaman, Sub-Inspector of Police Posted Maghiana, Jhang Saddar, Jhang, has filed this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974 in which he has impleaded the Deputy Inspector-General Police and the Superin­tendent of Police, Faisalabad as respondents. 2. Through this appeal the appellant Muhammad Zaman has prayed that the adverse remarks recorded in his A.C.R. for the year 1983 may be expunged. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant was communicated the following adverse remarks in his A.C.R. for the year 1983:- "(5.1) Investigation of crime against propert. , Below average. (b) Preventive action, action under Local and Special Laws. , Below average "6. Rating as a S. H .O. , if so appointed .... Below average "18. Fitness for retention after 25 years service. , Unfit "19. Class of report. , C' "General remarks. "Who did not take due interest in his work while posted as Incharge P.P. Jhang Bazar, hence his performance remained below average." The appellant submitted representation for the expunction of the adverse remarks but his representation was dismissed. Hence this appeal. 4. At the time of the arguments, the learned counsel of the appellant stated that adverse remarks concern for the period of 4 months only when the appellant was posted…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492