Case Details

Citation(s)
1986 SLG 1984 1986 SLD 1984 1986 PLC 257
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Case No. 105/120 of 1983, decided on 29th September, 1983.
ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHRY, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

FAZAL DAD

VS

SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MIANWALI and another

Law:

Section:

Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)- ---S. 4--Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5--Filing of appeal- -Condonation of delay--Copy of medical certificate showing civil servant's wife falling ill and he being in disturb mind failing to contact his counsel for submission of appeal in time--Adverse remarks recorded in Annual Confidential Report of civil servant for which appeal filed written in first week of January but conveyed to civil servant in September for which department also at fault and civil servant entitled to concession in such matter--Circumstances, held, justify condonation of delay in filing appeal. Masud Ahmad Riaz for Appellant. A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents. . JUDGMENT Mr. Fazal Dad, A.S.I. No. 372, Police Station Shahpur Saddar has made this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974, wherein he has impleaded the Superintendent of Police, Mianwali and the D.I.-G. Police, Sargodha Range, Sargodha as respondents. 2. By virtue of this appeal the appellant has prayed that the impugned orders, dated 7-9-1981 and 7-10-1982 be set aside and the adverse remarks in question be expunged. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant Mr. Fazal Dad, A.S.I. No. 372, was conveyed the adverse remarks for the period 1-1-1980 to 11-6-1980 vide order, dated 7-9-1981 of Respondent No. 2, as follows:- Readiness to accept responsibility. Below average. Rediness to expose subordinates. Below average. Integrity. Corrupt. Class of report. 'C' "General remarks. "This A.S.I. did not enjoy good reputation as I/C P.P. Jandanwala P.S. Kalur Kot, allegations of corruption were probed into, were substantiated and the enquiry papers were sent to S.P. Sargodha for necessary action as he had transferred." The appellant made a representation to the Deputy Inspector-­General of Police, Sargodha Range, Sargodha which was rejected vide his order, dated 7-10-1982. Hence this appeal. 4. I have heard the parties. It has been submitted by the learned District. Attorney that the representation of the appellant was rejected by the Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Sargodha Range, Sargodha vide order, dated 7-10-1982 and the appellant should…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492